IU Home Pages - Logo   February 25, 2005  
 
Home Events FYI Headliners Health Liberal 
arts Outreach Technology Research Contact  
Conversations Viewpoint Fast facts Web mastery @ 
Work Photographer's corner Friday flashback
  FYI
Infusing the sciences at the teacher level
Q&A with Charles Barman

By John R. Hughey


Photo by Chris Meyer
Barman

Charles Barman earned the Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Teaching for full-time faculty in 2004. He received the award largely for his directorship of a pilot program at the School of Education at IUPUI. The program is helping Indiana fill a growing need for qualified middle and high school teachers, especially in the sciences.

The school’s post-baccalaureate program for secondary teachers enables those with a bachelor’s degree to complete the requirements needed to become a certified teacher in one year.

IU Home Pages talked to Barman on the importance of training science teachers. His thoughts on training successful teachers follows:

Q. Are we facing a science teacher shortage?

A. It is a major problem. Data received from the superintendent of Indianapolis Public Schools suggests that in five years, IPS will have nearly 40 percent (science teachers) ready for retirement. I truly believe the demographics are shaping up to create a crisis. We have tremendous challenge to recruit.

Q. What are you doing to recruit new teachers?

A. The best thing we can do is to have a quality training program. Another option is a proposal submitted to National Science Foundation seeking basic scholarships for those who pursue science education. It would fit perfectly with our program.

Q. Can you tell me more about creating a successful training program?

A. Quality, at IUPUI, means two things. First, we must have a sound field base, requiring field study during fall and spring semesters. This means being in schools five days a week and taking classes at night. Also important is being placed with a really good mentor. Second, the pedagogy courses need to be relevant, to help them function in today’s classroom. Then obviously, we hope we are attracting really good candidates; most are coming from here in Indiana. And this is a post-baccalaureate program. A lot of the students are looking for a career change, but not all. They also tend to be older individuals.

Q. Why do you think keeping talented science teachers is such a tough challenge?

A. Do you know the number one reason novice teachers cite in dropping out? They say they aren’t prepared well enough for the classroom. Finding good mentors can help change that. Also critical is making sure education courses are up-to-date.

Q. Is Indianapolis a good place for training science teachers?

A. I think the city is a good resource because it offers a really large collection of informal museums and the zoo. All those places create interest and that’s important to tap into, so kids don’t lose interest. In the School of Education, we promote taking students to those places. We make it known to student teachers that the city has really great resources to use as part of their own teaching.

Q. What is the future like for your program?

A. As of right now, we are relatively small, and we’re doing that exactly as we planned so that we can monitor it carefully. We were only open to science the first two years, and last year, we expanded to social studies, math and foreign language. We are working with a full cohort of 25, and we hope to keep a cohort of that number. Eleven are science, six math and the rest divided between social studies and language.

Q. Do you have any words of advice for incoming teachers?

A. In terms of teaching in general, the key to success—I truly believe—is to model for your students. I have certain teaching methods they should be doing, and I try to model that behavior as I teach. I also believe students need to construct their own knowledge, creating experiences where they can stay away from constant lectures, have students taking charge of their own learning. The teacher serves as facilitator, instead of a top-down model. Journaling, reflection, actively engaged in whatever you are doing is more effective than passive learning.